Poverty Among American Women Soars, While Media Obsesses Over Kirk’s Delusional Life
As millions of women struggle to feed their families, the press chooses spectacle over substance.
In 2024 and 2025, the economic situation for many American women has failed to improve—or has worsened—in ways that receive far too little regular, serious media attention. While headlines have been dominated by dramatic political figures, controversies, and sensational stories, one of the most pressing crises for millions of women has remained muted: rising poverty, wage stagnation, and structural inequality. This neglect in mainstream coverage is not innocent. It undermines public awareness, weakens policy responses, and imposes long-term costs on families and the country.
Recent Data: The Scale of the Problem (2024-2025)
To understand what’s happening, we need to look at the latest reliable statistics:
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the official poverty rate in 2024 was 10.6%, down 0.4 percentage points from 2023. Census.gov However, the more comprehensive Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which adjusts for tax credits, non-cash benefits, and necessary expenses (housing, medical, etc.), held steady at 12.9% in 2024, virtually unchanged from 2023.
In data from the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), 13.6% of women and girls lived in poverty by the SPM in 2024, up from 13.4% in 2023.
Wage inequality by gender and race remains deep and, in some respects, worsening: full-time, year-round women workers earn substantially less than men. For example, Black women working full-time, year-round earned about 66 cents for each dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men; Latina women earned about 58 cents. When part-time/seasonal work is included, the gap is even wider.
Health insurance coverage, while high overall, still leaves millions exposed. In 2024, about 92.0% of people had some type of health insurance; about 8.0% were uninsured at some point during the year. Women, especially in marginalized racial/ethnic groups, are more likely to feel the impact of not being insured.
The female-to-male earnings ratio worsened in 2024: among full-time, year-round workers, women’s median earnings dropped, and their earnings ratio to men fell to about 80.9%, down from around 82.7% in 2023.
So: millions of women are living in poverty by the best available measures; wage gaps are growing; health risks and financial instability persist.
What the Media Is Covering—and What It’s Ignoring
In contrast to these huge numbers, what gets airtime and front-page space is often different: political drama, personalities, scandals, and sensational incidents. For example, media focus has recently centered heavily on the death of Charlie Kirk, debates about identity politics, and headline-grabbing political tragedies. While there is certainly value in those stories, comparatively little consistent reporting explores the scale, drivers, and consequences of poverty among American women—especially across race, age, and geography.
Some specific gaps:
Gender and poverty breakdowns in mainstream coverage are rare. When poverty is discussed, it is often in aggregate terms (national poverty rate, “poverty unchanged”) without highlighting how women—and subgroups of women—are especially affected.
Wage gap trends (especially declines or stagnation among women) may show up in policy or business reporting, but often without the depth or frequency needed to make them a sustained concern for public pressure or policy action.
Non-fiction public affairs shows, cable news, and front news pages rarely track poverty as a chronic issue; it becomes news only when there is a spike (due to disaster, sharp inflation, budget cuts) rather than as an ongoing crisis.
Why This Lack of Coverage Hurts Women & the Nation
The media’s neglect of women’s poverty has several serious consequences. It isn’t just a matter of what stories people read; it shapes what policymakers believe the public cares about, what publics know, and how resources are allocated.
Policy Inertia & Weak Responses
When millions are at risk, but most of the public is unaware of exactly who, how many, or why, policy responses tend to lag—or be misdirected. Without frequent coverage that humanizes or quantifies the problem, there is little pressure on lawmakers to expand social safety nets, increase minimum wages, or adjust tax credits. Policies that might help, such as stronger child‐tax credits, expanded childcare subsidies, affordable housing, or health care access, often struggle for visibility and support.
Misallocation of Public Attention and Funding
Media attention helps drive where government and philanthropic funding flow. When coverage is dominated by sensational individual stories, political personality conflicts, or focus on campaigns and scandals, the plight of poor women—especially outside big urban centers—gets sidelined. This means fewer resources for programs directly affecting women in poverty: housing, health, childcare, and eldercare.
Structural Inequality Deepens
Without scrutiny, wage gaps, racial disparities, and the burden of care (childcare, eldercare, sick family members) are reinforced rather than challenged. Because most women still perform a larger share of caregiving, those gaps mean not just low income today but reduced retirement savings, higher rates of debt, and greater financial insecurity in old age.
Economic & Social Costs for Everyone
When a large part of the population cannot afford basic necessities, broader society suffers. Children in poverty often face worse educational outcomes, poorer health, and limited upward mobility. Health care becomes costlier when preventive care is delayed or avoided. Homelessness, food insecurity, mental health struggles increase. This leads to higher public spending down the line, lower productivity, and weaker economic growth.
Evidence That the Situation Is Getting Worse—or At Least Not Better
The data doesn’t show progress; at best it shows stagnation, and in many metrics decline, particularly for women:
The SPM poverty rate for women rose or stayed roughly the same between 2023 and 2024. It was 13.4% for women/girls in 2023, and 13.6% in 2024.
The female-to-male earnings ratio weakened: women saw no significant median earnings increases between 2023 and 2024, while men did.
Minority women (Black, Latina, Native) continue to suffer much larger wage gaps and higher poverty rates, which are not closing in any meaningful way.
Inflation and rising living costs (housing, health, childcare, etc.) continue to erode any modest gains. The official poverty line threshold for a family of four rose, but many expenses rose faster. The SPM measure reflects that many of these costs are not optional and weigh heavily on women, especially single mothers and older women.
Case in Point: Child Tax Credit Expiration & Child Poverty
One of the clearest examples of how policy shifts and media invisibility combine:
Pandemic-era expansions of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) helped reduce child poverty dramatically when they were in force. When those were allowed to expire or scaled back, child poverty rates spiked. Using SPM, child poverty jumped by 1.3 percentage points in 2023 alone. politicsofpoverty.oxfamamerica.org
Media outlets did cover portions of that, especially in feature or economic policy sections—but rarely has the coverage sustained beyond a short span to show long-term effects on women, especially those who work but still struggle, or those in rural/underserved communities.
What Media Could Do (But Is Largely Not Doing)
To reduce harm, media needs to shift in practice in a few ways:
Regular reporting of poverty data by gender, race, age, and geography — not just once a year when new Census Bureau or similar reports drop, but as part of ongoing economic stories.
Investigative or feature stories that follow the lived reality of women in poverty—not just individual human-interest stories, but stories that show trends, consequences, and solutions.
Holding officials accountable: journalists should ask questions about how proposed budgets, policies, or regulations affect women in poverty, not only how they affect the median voter or households generally.
Elevating stories of collective struggle and systemic barriers (childcare, health care access, eldercare), rather than focusing mainly on individuals or sensational scandals.
Why It Matters: Long-Term Consequences
If nothing changes in how the media covers poverty among women, the consequences will multiply:
Generational harm: children growing up in households where mothers are in poverty are more likely to suffer educational deficits, poorer health, less opportunity.
Increasing health care costs: untreated health issues worsen when preventive care is skipped, increasing emergency care or chronic disease burdens.
Retirement insecurity: women are less likely to save, have pensions, or build wealth. Poverty in old age tends to hit women hard.
Inequality undermines social cohesion: when large demographic groups feel ignored, the trust in institutions erodes, polarizing society further.
Counter-Argument & Why It’s Not Enough
Some might argue: media does cover poverty, and sensational stories draw viewers; data reports do come out. But:
Much of what coverage exists is episodic rather than sustained. A crisis here, a budget debate there—but not enough continuous coverage to embed public understanding that poverty among women is a long-term systemic issue.
“Human interest” stories—while important—often present poverty through the lens of exceptional individuals, which can reinforce the idea that hardship is a personal failing, not a consequence of policy, structural inequality, or economic shifts.
The metrics themselves (such as the official poverty rate) are often misunderstood or misrepresented; many media outlets use the simpler metrics which understate the hardship. The SPM, which shows more clearly what poverty means once costs are accounted for, is less frequently featured even though it often tells a bleaker story.
Before You Click Away!
“Poverty Among American Women Soars, While Media Obsesses Over Kirk’s Delusional Life” is more than a provocative headline—it encapsulates a truth that is underappreciated in mainstream discourse. The numbers from 2024-2025 show that poverty among women is not improving in most meaningful ways. Wage gaps by gender and race remain large or are worsening. Health care costs, housing, childcare—essentials—keep rising. And millions of women continue to juggle these pressures, often invisibly.
Meanwhile, media attention gets diverted to dramatic personalities, political spectacle, and sensational conflicts—stories that, while compelling, do not replace the vigilance, consistency, and seriousness needed for societal problems of this magnitude. What is missing is not just data, but narrative focus:
1. Who is struggling?
2. How they are struggling.
3. And what can be done.
For the country as a whole, ignoring this crisis comes with steep costs—in education, public health, economic productivity, and social equity. Women represent half the population, caretakers for many children and elders, and essential parts of the workforce. When women suffer, society suffers.
To change course will require media outlets like “The Women Post” that refuse the easy headline, instead work tirelessly to track poverty as a chronic issue, that challenges structural causes, not just reporting the consequences. It will require political will, public awareness, and policy anchored in data and equity. Only then can poverty among American women become a front-page concern, not because it is sensational, but because it is central.
If you’re reading this as a free subscriber, we invite you to take the next step in supporting independent journalism. For a limited time, you can upgrade to our annual plan at 40% off. Your subscription helps us dig deeper, report bolder, and continue putting women’s stories and struggles at the center of the national conversation.